Nerdburn - Web application & graphic user interface design blog by Shawn Adrian

Web site design by Shawn Adrian & friends

Most People Want to Pay Monthly for Web Design

Posted October 31, 2009

As a freelance web designer, I'm always thinking of ways to smooth out the natural ups and downs of project based income. One of the ideas I've been toying with for a while is offering to build websites for a monthly cost, rather than an up front cost to the client. My research about this produced some interesting and positive feedback that has me re-thinking my business plan for 2010.

Self Financing

In essence, by stretching out the payment for a service I'm already providing up front, I would be self financing my customers at 0 percent interest. I chose not to have interest because I think people are leery of bankers and the whole credit based banking system right now, in light of the recession and many financial institutions collapsing.

Here's how it would work: For a project that would cost $6000 to create, a customer would pay me $250 per month for 24 months, and I would perform the work up front. This means that the only deposit I would receive on the work would be the first two $250 payments, not much in light of the value of the work, so I'd be taking a risk. Would it be worth it?

Pick-Fu To The Rescue

If you have a burning question and $5 or $10 to spare, Pick-Fu is the answer. I posted a simple question:

"As a business owner, which payment option would you prefer when purchasing a new web site for your business?"

  • Option A) Pay $250 monthly (24 month term)
  • Option B) Pay $6000 once

And within a number of hours I received an amazing amount of feedback.

Most Customers Want to Pay Monthly

While this one A/B test is not conclusive, I think the overwhelming majority to one side reflects a greater truth: Most customers would rather pay monthly for web design. In fact, out of 100 people polled, 82 of them chose to pay monthly. When you think about it, it does kind of make sense. If you compare this to other purchases customers make for their business - cars, office space, telephone service, internet service and shipping accounts, you begin to see a pattern in the way businesses operate. There is a definite pull toward managing income and expenses on a monthly basis, and stretching out fixed costs over time.

Reasons for Monthly Payments

Some of the comments on my Pick-Fu question relay why customers may want to pay monthly instead of all at once.

  • It keeps working capital in the business for unexpected expenses
  • It ensures the attention of the web designer over a longer period of time
  • Bank accounts pay interest on balance, so outlaying the payments over time would accrue more interest

In contrast, the only reasons that people would choose to pay all at once would be to avoid the potential hassle of a monthly bill, and to "get it out of the way". I think these comments reflect a small minority of potential customers.

If you're a freelancer, you've probably already imagined yourself receiving a fixed monthly payment from somewhere, but haven't figured out yet where it could come from. By splitting contracts up over a term, you're basically ensuring yourself a steady income during the slow months, and enabling more month-to-month communication between you and your clients, which is always helpful for gaining future projects.

Finishing Up

Do you have any experience splitting projects up into monthly payments? If so, comment and share them below. Also, if you're interested in checking out the details of my Pick-Fu question, feel free to check it out.

Comments

I like the concept and have often thought about this myself. What I see as a big obstacle is scope creep and changes. If I am "contracted" over 24 months, I fear that the client would see me as their personal web designer and make changes often.

How would you approach changes?

I like the thought of getting $250 payments every month for a couple years, but that invoicing would be unmanageable.

Say you do 20 websites a year. At the end of the second year, you would have to worry about 40 different clients paying you on time every single month. That is a lot of money to chase and I would see myself spending a considerable amount of time just getting my money from work I did 2 years ago.

Wow, the comments were complete eye openers. I think I'll offer this to clients who need more than just an information site.

Freshbooks has a feature that allows you to create recurring invoices. You can set how frequently to send the invoice (ie. monthly, quarterly, etc.) and how many occurrences (infinite or in your case 24). You can also set the invoice to Auto-Bill if you have the client's credit card information. I think this could make managing invoices a lot less stressful! Plus, Freshbooks can send out late payment notices depending on the number of days you set (eg 15, 30, 45, etc)

That's a pretty interesting concept that we recently started using too. We have found it's great for a steady flow of income and it gives the client and you more time to work out concepts, instead of the rush to finish the project. We try to set a budget for the project, but leave it open so new changes or ideas can be added. So far we have found some clients really like it, I would be interested to hear how your experience goes after a few months. Like you responded to Kevin, we use some software for reoccurring billing. Good post and ideas.

i think spreading the cost over 2 years might not be a pain to set them up automatically, but i think it is too risky. if, like me, most of your clients are small businesses, guess which bill they'll pay first if they go out of business? probably their own mortgage or healthcare, not your website bill. i would venture to guess that this would lead to a lot of defaulting on payments and would put you in funny situations if you had 40 monthly clients whose work had already been done. if each one of them expects to be able to call you and you spend an hour a week on each, you have no new time for clients for new money.
plus this survey is of course going to skew to the results you got. if i could, i'd spread my house payment over 1000 years at a tiny price.

so really, i'd just advise being careful. we try to set our clients up with project estimates and bill hourly, and if they want firm prices, we spread out (for example) a 12 week project over 4 equal installments over 14 weeks at most.

great topic though, i'm all ears to others thoughts on how to improve consistent cashflow. good luck and keep up the good fight!

Very interesting article, just searching for new ideas for 2010 and this is one of them. Ever though of building a core for all of your customers and keep improving/adding new features? If customers know they are getting more over the months, you will keep them (happy). For extra work, you might be able to use ticket system and create a new feature for all your customers instead 1 only.

This seems to rely on a lot of customer trust. How do you verify that the customer will be able to make all of the 24 payments? What if they stop paying?

Also I agree with some of the first comments that this scenario tends towards the client thinking of you as being "on-call" anytime for 2 years, which could really backfire.

We do this with a twist.

We recoup 100% of our money in 18 months but continue the payments for another 6.

For example, that $6000 website would be $335 per month for 24 months. We just don't tell the client what the cost would be.

We determine their needs. If they want a $6000 site but can only spend $4000...a common occurance...we say we can do the $6000 site for payments. They like the concept. The perception is more website for less money.

But we also require that we host and we own the domain name until paid in full. No pay, we pull the plug..."Site owner must contact Webmaster" message appears. No company wants their customers to see that.

Auto debit works well.

So, what happens when an uneducated client sees no traffic to their site and decides to stop paying you because you "didn't do your job"? Most of my clients have this illusion that after I create a site for them, the world will be beating down their virtual door. I try to educate all of my clients, but some just don't get that I simply provide them a marketing tool, and they are responsible for utilizing that tool properly. A few of my clients have taken my advice and optimized it to their benefit while others have let it go in one ear and right out the other.

My biggest concern would be to develop a large, time-consuming project, and get stiffed in the end because they didn't want to put forth the effort or funds to properly utilize the tool I developed for them.

I'm thinking some sort of hybrid of this would work pretty good. What if you required a deposit that would cover all expenses minus your time? This way you can at least cover your overhead (and subs) but still offer the convenience (and security?) of the monthly payments.

I was just thinking... With the economy the way it is right now, is this truly a good idea? With all of the businesses going under right now, you might never get paid. Then again, you could help them stay afloat with small monthly payments. It's really a difficult decision to make as a freelancer.

Would this option have the added benefit of being able to charge more for your services (if they choose this payment method)? If so, how much more could you realistically tack on? You are, after all, taking a big risk.

Shawn,
I agree that it is worth a look. I am trying to figure out how I want t5o do this myself. I just presented this as a possible option with a client that is sort of on the fence (but understands the importance of having a web presence) and her budget is pretty tight. I was thinking of a bit of a twist on your idea, and this is what I presented my client. I also host, manage domains, etc for a small fee. I told my client that I might do a single page, hosting, domain name and all, for $29.99/mo. As long as she has the site, she pays the fee. She thought it sounded much better than the $150 I had quoted her for a single page.
If I get my pricing structure together before I start her project I might just experiment on her. I figure it's a single page, so I won't lose any money of she stays with it at that price for 2 months or more. (That's not taking my time into account) I would imagine that even if she gets discouraged with the site, or has to cut costs and starts with me, I can keep her on for at least 6 months. That's $180 for a $150 page, $10 domain name, and $36 in hosting fees (I host myself, so I don't have any fees for this)

I would be interested in seeing some real world results too. I'll try to remember to post mine should I go ahead with the plan. If this deal works out, and goes smoothly, I might just try this on larger projects.

Displaying all 12 comments

Add comment

About The Author

Shawn is a 29 year old freelance designer in Vancouver, BC, Canada. Check out his other project QuoteRobot:

QuoteRobot